whats with Sudan?
Everybody’s talking about the situation in Tibet and thats a good thing. Chinas policy and Tibets liberation efforts are of everyone’s concern. I think whats happening now can only help China on its way to democracy. Tibets demands, carefully worded by the Dalai Lamah, are not of unaccompishable nature. He’s not speaking of segregation but exclusive rights for the Tibetians to live out their culture. He sees Tibet as part of China - I am not sure if those who fight in the streets of Lhasa are on the same opinion, though.
Meanwhile, on the african continent, China supports bad governance (Angola) and tolerates even genocide (Sudan) in order to meet their requirements, to still its hunger for oil.
I don’t see this issue to be discussed in the german public with the same dedication and passion as the military operation in Iraq by the US or the Israel/Palestine conflict. (isn’t this proof that a new form of antisemitism and anti-americanism have reached the mainstream in german society?)
There’s no day without an article about these two conflicts, when you walk the streets downtown of any german city you see kids wearing the kufiya, anti-american slogans belong to every day language. Yesterday Barbara and me saw the movie “shooting dogs” that deals with the genocide in Rwanda. Watching it was a nightmare. To see the UN failing in this very conflict gives one an idea how the UN might work in general. We should rectify our picture of the UN as a noble place where smart politicians talk about world peace.
In Darfur, officials are speaking of 200,000 deads and about 2,3 million displaced persons, where is Juergen Todenhoefer, describing an african childhood in a sudanese war zone?
Where was Todenhoefers sympathy for the iraqi resistance when Saddam Hussein was still in power?